{"id":68,"date":"2011-07-31T22:52:45","date_gmt":"2011-08-01T02:52:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/example.org\/government-agenda-21-update-family-farms-are-under-attack"},"modified":"2011-07-31T22:52:45","modified_gmt":"2011-08-01T02:52:45","slug":"government-agenda-21-update-family-farms-are-under-attack","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/makingripples.com\/?p=68","title":{"rendered":"Government Agenda 21 Update: Family Farms Are Under Attack"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"content\">\n<div>\n<div>\n<div id=\"postContent\">\n<p>I read the very first link in this article and I fear for the farmers of Floyd County. Read the proposed rule and see if you agree. There is a lot of what I would call weasel-wording about who this regulation would apply to but once in place there are no safeguards that the DOT would not raise the requirements as they see fit.<\/p>\n<p>Once again, the federal government is extending its reach into areas that are the resonsibility of the state.<\/p>\n<div id=\"header_logo\">\n<h3><a href=\"http:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/\" title=\"Federal Register Home\">The Federal Register<\/a><\/h3>\n<h4>The Daily Journal of the United States Government<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<h4>Proposed Rule<\/h4>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/articles\/2011\/05\/31\/2011-13035\/regulatory-guidance-applicability-of-the-federal-motor-carrier-safety-regulations-to-operators-of\" target=\"_self\">Regulatory Guidance: Applicability of the Federal Motor  Carrier Safety Regulations to Operators of Certain Farm Vehicles and  Off-Road Agricultural Equipment<\/a><\/h4>\n<hr \/>\n<div id=\"postContent\"><\/div>\n<div><strong><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Government Agenda 21 Update: Family Farms Are Under Attack<\/span><\/strong><\/div>\n<div>Originally posted on July 31, 2011 at 1:07pm by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theblaze.com\/blog\/author\/mikeopelka\/\" target=\"_self\" title=\"Posts by Mike&#0160;Opelka\">Mike&#0160;Opelka<\/a><\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/articles\/2011\/05\/31\/2011-13035\/regulatory-guidance-applicability-of-the-federal-motor-carrier-safety-regulations-to-operators-of\" target=\"_blank\">In Late May, the DOT proposed a rule change for farm equipment<\/a>,  and if it this allowed to take effect, it will place significant  regulatory pressure on small farms and family farms all across America \u2013  costing them thousands of dollars and possibly forcing many of them out  of business. The&#0160;Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA),  part of the Department of Transportation (DOT), wants new standards that  would require all farmers and everyone on the farm to obtain a CDL  (Commercial Drivers License) in order to operate any farming equipment.  The agency is going to accomplish this by reclassifying all farm  vehicles and implements as Commercial Motor Vehicles (CMVs).<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em>(It is also important to note here that DOT Secretary Ray LaHood holds a seat on the newly created <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theblaze.com\/stories\/does-the-new-white-house-rural-council-uns-agenda-21\/\" target=\"_self\">White House Rural Council<\/a>. A powerful group whose members have ties to George Soros and The Center For American Progress.)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The move by the DOT appears to be \u201clegislation through regulation.\u201d  By reclassifying all farm vehicles and implements as Commercial  Vehicles, the federal government will now be able to claim regulatory  control over the estimated 800,000 farm workers in America, at the same  time, overriding the rights of the states.<\/p>\n<p>This proposed change literally means family farms could no longer  legally allow young workers, not old enough to drive and seniors who no  longer drive on the public streets, to operate a tractor\u2026 even on the  family\u2019s private property.<\/p>\n<p>Waco, TX television station KXXV has the story:<\/p>\n<p>The proposed change also means ANYONE driving a tractor or operating  any piece of motorized farming equipment would be forced to pass the  same rigorous tests and fill out the same detailed forms and diaries  required of semi-tractor trailer drivers. This reclassification would  bury small farms and family farms in regulation and paperwork.<\/p>\n<p>Some of the additional paperwork and regulation required:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Detailed logs would need to be kept by all drivers \u2013 hours worked, miles traveled, etc.<\/li>\n<li>Vehicles would have to display DOT numbers<\/li>\n<li> Drivers would need to pass a physical as well as a drug test \u2013 every two years.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/dairybusiness.com\/headlines\/farm-bureau-opposes-dot-changes-regarding-farm-trucks\" target=\"_blank\">Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation<\/a> (WFBF) is one of many farm organizations not happy about the idea and has sent the DOT a letter expressing this opinion:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cWFBF opposes any change in statue or regulatory  authority that would reclassify implements of husbandry or other farm  equipment as Commercial Motor Vehicles (CMVs)\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.wisfarmer.com\/editorial\/125569148.html\" target=\"_blank\">WFBF Director of Governmental Relations Karen Gefvert<\/a> continues, explaining the excessive cost to farmers if this allowed to move forward:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cThe proposed guidance by the FMCSA would result in an  initial increased cost to each Wisconsin farmer and employee of $124  just for the CDL license, permit and test; not to mention the time and  cost for the behind-the-wheel training that is several thousand  dollars.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Additionally, Illinois farmers believe this regulation will also  force new restrictions on trucks used in crop-share hauling. (One  estimate claims more than 30% of Illinois farmers utilize shared land.)  These crop-share trucks are typically limited-use vehicles that often  travel fewer than 3000 miles each year, mainly hauling crops from the  fields to nearby grain elevators. To require them to follow the same  rules as semis would also mean a farmer would be forced to purchase  substantial insurance.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.theblaze.com\/stories\/agenda-21-update-family-farms-are-under-attack\/Earlier%20this%20year,%20the%20Federal%20Motor%20Carrier%20Safety%20Administration%20%28FMCSA%29%20began%20to%20define%20crop-share%20tenant%20farmers%20as%20%22for-hire%22%20carriers%20and%20implements%20of%20husbandry%20as%20%22commercial%20motor%20vehicles.%22%20The%20%22for-hire%22%20designation%20for%20crop-share%20tenant%20farmers%20would%20have%20a%20dramatic%20effect%20on%20farmers%20because%20it%20voids%20exemptions%20from%20the%20Commercial%20Driver%27s%20License%20%28CDL%29%20program%20and%20would%20require%20a%20minimum%20of%20$750,000%20in%20insurance%20coverage%20for%20the%20farmer.\" target=\"_self\">The Hancock Journal-Pilot covered the story<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Earlier this year, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety  Administration (FMCSA) began to define crop-share tenant farmers as  \u201cfor-hire\u201c carriers and implements of husbandry as \u201dcommercial motor  vehicles.\u201c The \u201dfor-hire\u201d designation for crop-share tenant farmers  would have a dramatic effect on farmers because it voids exemptions from  the Commercial Driver\u2019s License (CDL) program and would require a  minimum of $750,000 in insurance coverage for the farmer.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The DOT is holding hearings for public comment on the topic, but only  through Monday, August 1st and farmers all across the country are  rightfully concerned. No matter what the feedback is from the people who  actually grow the food, it appears that the DOT\u2019s mind is made up. Just  last week, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fmcsa.dot.gov\/about\/news\/news-releases\/2011\/USDOT-and-America-Farmers.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">DOT Administrator Anna Ferro posted an Op-Ed <\/a>addressing the controversial regulation. The opinion piece closes with this statement:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Everyone in this Administration \u2013 from President Obama,  Vice President Biden, and Secretary LaHood on down \u2013 is committed to the  long-term success of America\u2019s agricultural industry. In many ways,  agriculture is the backbone of our economy \u2013 feeding hundreds of  millions of Americans and billions more around the world. As the largest  user of freight transportation in the nation, the agricultural industry  is also one of USDOT\u2019s most important constituents. We hope that this  comment period is the start of a new and productive relationship. We may  not ultimately agree on every issue, but we will always listen \u2014 and do  our best to help America\u2019s farmers succeed.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><em>(A personal aside, when someone tells you, \u201cWe may not ultimately  agree on every issue, but we will always listen\u2026 \u201d it has always been  my experience that they are going to do whatever they wanted to do in  the first place. The \u201clistening\u201d was just to make you feel better.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The FMCSA has said their intent is to create uniformity in how  federal safety regulations are carried out across America. The farming  community and many of the states that would be affected by this change  feel differently. Almost to a man, the farming community believes this  to be a local issue, best handled by state governments, and not some  Washington DC agency.<\/p>\n<p>To make a comment to the DOT visit \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theblaze.com\/stories\/agenda-21-update-family-farms-are-under-attack\/www.regulations.gov\" target=\"_self\">www.regulations.gov<\/a>.  Follow the&#0160;instructions for submitting comments on the Federal  electronic docket site. Or you can fax your comments here  1\u2013202\u2013493\u20132251.<\/p>\n<p>H\/T \u2013 All the active Farm Bureaus working to protect their rights and  states rights. And to the ever-vigilent \u201cResist UN Agenda 21\u201d groups  (you know who you are)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding-bottom: 20px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ad.doubleclick.net\/click;h=v8\/3b56\/0\/0\/%2a\/z;44306;0-0;0;58127817;7453-605\/100;0\/0\/0;;%7Esscs=%3f\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Click here to find out more!\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/s0.2mdn.net\/viewad\/817-grey.gif\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I read the very first link in this article and I fear for the farmers of Floyd County. Read the proposed rule and see if you agree. There is a lot of what I would call weasel-wording about who this &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/makingripples.com\/?p=68\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1780,1781,1767,1759],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3R4iK-16","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/makingripples.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/makingripples.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/makingripples.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/makingripples.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/makingripples.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=68"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/makingripples.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/makingripples.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=68"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/makingripples.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=68"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/makingripples.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=68"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}