Normally affable Charles Gibson gave one of the poorest interviews I have ever seen. He might have been worried about something. Well, after tonight’s performance he definitely has something to worry about.<\/p>\n
His use of trick questions has already backfired on him. More than a dozen bloggers nailed Charlie for demanding Gov. Palin answer for something
\nshe did not say regarding the War in Iraq being a task from God. <\/p>\n
Instapundit<\/a> has links with all of the dismal details. Confederate Yankee<\/a> is also disappointed with Gibson.<\/p>\n In watching the show I noticed that Sarah’s voice was edited out several times when replying to one of Charlies questions. This is an old 20\/20 technique for slanting an interview and it suggests that the fix was in to make this interview go a particular way. <\/p>\n Sarah kept her composure and didn’t back down at any time. She was well I went to the ABC News site<\/a> and found a transcript of the interview. There are Why do I get this recurring echo of "fake but accurate" when I think of listening to Charles Gibson now.<\/p>\n UPDATE: For those who missed the interview, here is Part One of the Sarah Palin interview<\/a>. Look at Charlie’s body language.<\/p>\n (A tip of the hat to Pal2Pal.com)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Normally affable Charles Gibson gave one of the poorest interviews I have ever seen. He might have been worried about something. Well, after tonight’s performance he definitely has something to worry about. His use of trick questions has already backfired … Continue reading
\nprepared and her answers obviously frustrated Charlie, because he would
\ndrop the line of questioning immediately without acknowledging what she
\nhad said.<\/p>\n6462<\/del> 8727<\/del> 9506<\/del> 10605 comments and about half of them describe Charles Gibson as a condescending jerk. <\/p>\n