Appeasement and Neville Chamberlain

Appeasement is a strategy that has been employed throughout history by weaker nations facing destruction by stronger nations. Animals do this frequently and signify their inability to cope by rolling on their backs with their throats exposed.

Unfortunately, terrorists do not have the basic decency of animals. Their motivation is destruction, not domination.

The most well-known case of appeasement is the appeasement of Adolf Hitler’s Germany by United Kingdom Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain’s government in the late 1930s. Chamberlain, a good and dedicated man, truly believed he had secured “Peace in Our Time” through discussion instead of by force of arms. When he returned from his meeting with Hitler, he was celebrated as a hero who had saved England from destruction.

What he did allowed Hitler to overrun Europe without the fear of intervention from UK forces. When Hitler had Europe in his pocket, he was able to concentrate on the battle of Britain and would have wrapped it up if the US had not intervened.

Neville Chamberlain, although he meant well, became remembered for his monumental misjudgement of Hitler’s character.

Well, history seems to repeat itself. The recent events in Spain show that the lessons of history are soon forgotten. A terrorist attack by al-Qaeda prompted Spanish voters to give the terrorists what they wanted: a Socialist government that opposes America’s war on terrorism.

Although this will come as a great surprise to those who deny any connection between Iraq and al-Quaeda, a videotaped message from the al-Qaeda “military commander” for Europe claimed credit for the bombings, saying that the terrorist attack was meant to punish Spain for supporting the war in Iraq.

Ann Coulter presents this sad story far more eloquently than I can. Read her article, The Reign in Spain Falls Mainly on the Lame.

The Spanish people I used to know were proud and courageous people. Evidently they are in the minority. I am sure that Spanish voters will regret their timidity. Let’s hope it doesn’t cost them their country.

Update: The Gray Monk had more to say on his subject.

This entry was posted in Daily Drama. Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to Appeasement and Neville Chamberlain

  1. Thanks for the link. I found your post equally informative.

  2. Bill says:

    Well, entirely independent polls showed that 90% of the Spanish public was against Spain’s getting ito the Iraq war. Any government that moves against the wishes of 90% of its population, provided it’s a democracy, has to know what it is risking. The Aznar government was also run like an autocracy, among other things preventing the discovery of massed graves from the Franco era. There’s a lot more to say about Aznar, but just keep in mind that most Spaniards disliked him and his policies. He was poised for a fall.

    Ann Coulter thinks that “liberals” are not patriotic. She has made a career out of saying and writing outrageous things, so I regard reading her as entertainment… not as a serious source of opinion.

    Bill

  3. Bill,

    Thanks for your comments. You are absolutely right that a government is at risk if they move against the will of the majority.

    Do you have a source for your entirely independent poll? Ann Coulter, and I, may say outrageous things, but we show our sources, so our readers know where the data is coming from.

    This site encourage quoting of data from identifiable sources. Anyone want to help Bill out?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

− seven = one